Update UFO UpDates

UFO UpDates is the leading Ufological Mailing List on the Internet. This blog is a snide swipe bitch fest at some of the characters and threads that come up on the List. Visitors here are encouraged to be indescribably rude and abusive about Updates posters. You can subscribe to Updates at ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net and join in the fun.

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Is Tim Printingshop Right After All? Can I Keep it Up?

There is an art to writing these blog entries you know and a formula seems slowly to be taking shape. The first and most important point I try to decide on beforehand is the “fuck” quota. It can vary posting to posting and depends on intended impact. If I want to go right off the Penisonhead Aggressive Male testosterone scale then usually its about 15 or so fucks in a posting, but to be honest, I’m not sure that I’ve ever got to that many which makes me really question how angry and aggressive I truly am. As Printingshop asked elsewhere at this blog, is it possible to remain angry and plain repulsive and unpleasant for ever? Well, I’m going to damn well try, just for you boys and girls, because I know how much you appreciate it, but I ask for mercy and consideration if occasionally an element of “niceness” creeps in.

One such dollop of niceness is about to descend upon you, very much, really, like a lump of bird shit falling from the heavens, but it will be brief because I feel slimy and dirty for doing it. I wish to congratulate Mickeymous (Anonymous) for two very recent interesting postings in the comments sections. The first is message 20 in the outstanding Tedious Bunch of Retards posting, now sadly probably gone from the bottom of this page, in which he finally applies some reasonable common sense and logic and acknowledges that I am not Regan. On the other hand I could call him a slow witted slime oozing bundle of green snot because although he got there, he should have got there in the same fashion months ago. Idiot!

The other interesting posting from Mickey is in the thread below this, Is Regan Jewish? in which he posts a URL of a self portrait by the lady.

http://www.artwanted.com/imageview.cfm?id=203776&SubGal=Portraits

You will probably have to cut and paste to get it but it’s worth it because my God; Regan is a hottie, although she does have some issues. She has a funny yellow nose and the same coloring extends to the bags under her eyes, and also, her choice of hair shade is a bit bizarre. She’s heavy on the eyeliner too, although that is always, of course, a matter of personal choice and we wouldn’t want to be seen to judge regarding that. And for some reason, she has enormous triangles of brown on her cheeks but really I shouldn’t mention those either as they could be the remnants of some disfiguring childhood illness. Her nostrils stare back at you a bit eerily as well, almost as if they have a life of their own and are getting ready to speak. I wonder what would they say? Other than that, she is a very beautiful lady. Mind you, apparently it was a bad day.

Niceness over; Anonymous, you’re a twat.

You will be thrilled to know that I now have a Sick Stick, a gift from a helpful reader and it means that from here on, after I have been sick here, instead of fishing around in it with my fingers to search for items of interest, I can poke around instead with the stick which I’m sure you’ll all agree is much more hygienic. I look forward to my next heave. They are such exciting events.

Oh yes, I knew there was something else………UFOs. I knew this blog had a purpose. Shit, it’s gone dull on UpDates again, hasn’t it? Lehmberg, write a serious posting for Updates and make us all hysterical again.


I was going to "go" then but I remembered a couple of things. Firstly Regan I'm sorry, because this might begin to get tedious but you'll have to do a link to this thread too now.

And also, and this isn't a dig at anyone in particular, but what do you think of these self indulgent, up their own asses, inward looking, shallow, conceited, vain, twat heads who think that we're the slightest bit interested in what fucking mood they're in while they're writing their fucking god-awful blogs? I mean, WHO CARES? WE DON'T. KEEP YOUR FUCKING NARCCISTIC INANE DRIBBLING RAMBLINGS TO YOURSELVES.

I guess that means I don't think I like them. Oh, and guess what mood I'm in.



21 Comments:

  • At 3:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "I wish to congratulate Mickeymous (Anonymous) for two very recent interesting postings in the comments sections. The first is message 20 in the outstanding Tedious Bunch of Retards posting, now sadly probably gone from the bottom of this page, in which he finally applies some reasonable common sense and logic and acknowledges that I am not Regan. On the other hand I could call him a slow witted slime oozing bundle of green snot because although he got there, he should have got there in the same fashion months ago. Idiot!"

    "The other interesting posting from Mickey is in the thread below this, Is Regan Jewish? in which he posts a URL of a self portrait by the lady."


    Mickeymous? Anonymous? Harumph!

    That's Mr. Anonymichael, sir! (ala Mr. L). Nope, wrong again, Artless. You're tripping over your presumptions once again. I always sign my comments "anonymichael'. Talk about slow on the draw, Art.

    The question of whether you and Regan might be one and the same was raised over on OE's blog Oct.19th. I concluded you were not Regan, based on various factors noted there. My comments were inspired by OE's implications, which I believe are incorrect, that suggest you and Regan may be the same person. Simple as that.

    So I should have reached that conclusion months ago? Gee, could it have anything to do with the fact that I've been following this blog for less than a month? Your id (or ego) monster is showing.

    I also did not post the link to Regan's self-portrait on your blog. You mistook that faux German rip to be my work? I would be insulted if I wasn't dealing with a psychotic quisling. While I did _intend_ to post something in the "Is Regan Jewish" post comments section, a farewell to arms, I never got around to it. Decided taking a nap would be more interesting. I guess you were fooled. Not for the first time either, I'll bet.

    ("slow witted slime oozing bundle of green snot" Oh, Artie! You say the sweetest things....)

    More later.

    "Mr." Anonymichael

     
  • At 11:51 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Ha! Just looked at comment 20 in your post "Tedious Bunch of Retards".

    That wasn't me, either. With the exception of a few early comments, I've signed mine as "anonymichael."

    Getting a bit slow, aren't you Artie? Or does it just get a bit confusing for you trolling around in the vast intellect of yours? For shame...(giggle). Perhaps the title of that post is actually more self-referential than anything else.

    --anonymichael

     
  • At 2:43 AM, Blogger Arthur said…

    I really hate to say this, because it isn't nice, but actually, you all look the same.

    Of course, when I get to know you as people, then the color of your ...... Oh shit.

    BTW, if you would like a change of Nasty Blogger, because its true I can get a bit tedious, but you still want to stay in the Ufological field, you can go here. Yes, Rich is back.

    The Extinction of UFOs
    http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2006/10/extinction-of-ufos.html

     
  • At 3:55 AM, Blogger The Odd Emperor said…

    Strange is it not?

    Seems like everyone’s identity is in question here, Arthur’s (not really but let’s play the game.) Regan Lee, and the various anonymous sock-puppets. Am I the only one who hasn’t posted here anonymously?

    Ironic, don’t-cha-think Mr. L?

     
  • At 6:33 AM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    Not EVEN, You nym-witted whack-a-doodle... that sole non-anonymous would be me. See, what's "OE" but the same kind of anony-moid mask to hide behind!

    You confuse irony and insentience. No one is surprised.


    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 1:47 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    A.L.F. wrote:

    You confuse irony and insentience. No one is surprised.

    That's like saying "You confuse Candide with pond scum." It doesn't make sense. Not even in context.

     
  • At 4:13 PM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    I'd be the first with an appropriate mea culpa... but... mmmmm-no... Sense enough.

    The context is stomping on an especially pointy little head who doesn't know irony from his own flatulent insentience, as was made plain if you're keeping up. I guess you were just awaiting your turn for same?

    ...Step up, nym-rod.

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 8:08 PM, Blogger The Odd Emperor said…

    The context is stomping on an especially pointy little head who doesn't know irony from his own flatulent insentience,

    And so A.L.F., how’s that going for you?

     
  • At 8:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Oh no! I followed Alfred's blog link again, which he always teases us with, and found another upsetting picture/drawing that is under the blog entry that featured the homoerotic photo of the naked,suffering man with his penis and pubes showing.

    This is equally disturbing but in a different way-
    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3838/770/400/hyper28e.0.jpg?SSImageQuality=Full

    Miniscule mosquito-bitten nipples that lack areolas. And going lower are two little mons veneras with wee clitoris',then surrounding and below that are four frightening scallop/peacock-feathered/monkey-assed things that should not be there!!

    Why "Hoss"??

     
  • At 10:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    artie says:

    http://www.artwanted.com/imageview.cfm?id=203776&SubGal=Portraits

    You will probably have to cut and paste to get it but it’s worth it because my God; Regan is a hottie, although she does have some issues. She has a funny yellow nose and the same coloring extends to the bags under her eyes, and also, her choice of hair shade is a bit bizarre. She’s heavy on the eyeliner too, although that is always, of course, a matter of personal choice and we wouldn’t want to be seen to judge regarding that. And for some reason, she has enormous triangles of brown on her cheeks but really I shouldn’t mention those either as they could be the remnants of some disfiguring childhood illness. Her nostrils stare back at you a bit eerily as well, almost as if they have a life of their own and are getting ready to speak. I wonder what would they say? Other than that, she is a very beautiful lady. Mind you, apparently it was a bad day.

    Artie--You have to understand that eyeliner! Looks like Orange Orb homegirl is into middle eastern exotica on her eyes; like the faboo Kohl Eyeliner from Guerlain. You just can not beat Guerlain's quality for making eyes look fucktastic, whether there is a pussy or a dick below. http://www.strawberrynet.com/800/sproductDetail.aspx?ProdId=51560&SID=336603z510147044

    And those patches on OOs homegirl's face could use that old work horse which is in every bitches bathroom cabinet--Alpha Hydroxy Cream- to slough off the dead skin and ring in the new, unless girlfriend is working that horsey Camilla Parker Bowles look.

    Eww and Xnay to the truckstop-trick redhair and Michael Jackson nose! Her squared face, jaw and thick linebacker neck shows it's clear that a petite peony she's not. Girlfriend looks beat.

     
  • At 10:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    A.L.F. wrote:

    Step up, nym-rod.

    Nimrod: 1.) Mythical biblical king (OT). Rumoured to be a hunter of men, with his bow. Built an edifice, "The Tower of Babel," to reach "even unto the heavens" as symbol of defiance to God, and symbol of his greatness to man. Humbled for his arrogance when Yaweh (the deity,not the balloon-prophet)confused the languages, so that his builders could not communicate. Hence, no tower, and Nimrod was sorely humbled.

    2.) A British electronic countermeasures platform,in service for decades, only recently removed from service and replaced with something better.

    The second reference makes no sense. The first does make sense; indeed, it is an excellent allegory when applied to A.L.F. You see, it is not lack of humility, but rather an abdundance of it that drives me. I have engaged in building no edifice unto heaven, in defiance to man (and I don't believe in the Christian God). Yet A.L.F. builds what he purports to be mighty edifice founded on paranoid, post-modern conspiracist thinking, and glues it together with all manner and variety of specious thought and reams of cryptic prose in the guise of poetry. And having built himself this tower, he climbs to the top like King Kong (sans Fay Ray), and there beats his breast day and night in a dominance display. "Who is like A.L.F!?" goes out his cry to the mute and deaf Void.

    EXCEPT...the world isn't watching, A.L.F. This voice of A.L.F out in the wilderness, prophesying a quasi-technological Rapture, this Ezekiel with foo-fighter visions, this builder of conspiracist edifices, remains, and will ever remain relegated to the fringes, to the visions that come in the night, in the dark, desert spaces of his own mind.

    A.L.F sets himself at odds with the world, not the other way around.

     
  • At 5:49 AM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    //Nimrod: 1.) Mythical biblical king (OT). Rumoured to be a hunter of men, with his bow. Built an edifice, "The Tower of Babel," to reach "even unto the heavens" as symbol of defiance to God, and symbol of his greatness to man. Humbled for his arrogance when Yaweh (the deity,not the balloon-prophet)confused the languages, so that his builders could not communicate. Hence, no tower, and Nimrod was sorely humbled.//

    I've a few moments. Go around to the kitchen Mr. Pettingill...

    ...No, *Diogenes*, you smug and insipid charlatan... "nym-rod" or: lack-witted nym-user not unlike yourself. A cyber-wastrel without responsibility, imagination, or talent, frankly. A coward on many levels who assumes a persona he cannot own and exhorts real people into validating their pathetic selves by provoking spankings like these...

    ...Then to add tedious insult to specious injury they either get their references to these errant avatars wrong or correct in a way they were too insentient to perceive themselves.

    *Diogenes* casts him/herself as the high-ground cyber-cynic and a bulwark against the dreaded credulous woo. In reality, he does something less than "search with a lantern in the daylight for an honest man." As he sifts the innocent expressions of others ostensibly to expose their vanity and selfishness he reveals him/herself to be just another puddle deep cyber "rake" and intellectual "spendthrift," living out his/her self-loathing to become, in their pathetic dim bulb realities the austere ascetic wearing humble clothing of the coarsest weave, eating the plainest food... his/her flop the bare ground.

    He would 'dare' to tell Alexander to stand out of his sunlight and hear Alexander remark to a colleague regarding his admiration for the tub-dwelling Diogenes... forgetting that the REAL Diogenes didn't hide behind a sack-less anonymity.

    Sincerely, _our_ Diogenes is only that person disposed to rail or find fault; now usually: one who shows a disposition to disbelieve in the sincerity or goodness of human motives and actions, and is _wont_ to express this by _sneers_ and _sarcasms_; or like a sneering fault-finder, just more cowardly. The image of that cynic remaining to us: a churlish cur.

    //2.) A British electronic countermeasures platform,in service for decades, only recently removed from service and replaced with something better.//

    Such a _depth_ of facile knowledge! You must scorch your mirrors! Heavens!

    //The second reference makes no sense. The first does make sense; indeed, it is an excellent allegory when applied to A.L.F. You see, it is not lack of humility, but rather an abdundance of it that drives me.//

    Not so -- the only evidence of that is you saying so. You lack idiosyncratic credit in the credulity bank, forgetting you're a couple of trips short of the clue queue. Next!

    //I have engaged in building no edifice unto heaven, in defiance to man (and I don't believe in the Christian God).//

    Awww! Has God pissed in your post-toasties, too? Maybe it's because the only edifice you can hope for is the abused one in your trendy sack-cloth trousers.

    //Yet A.L.F. builds what he purports to be mighty edifice founded on paranoid, post-modern conspiracist thinking, and glues it together with all manner and variety of specious thought and reams of cryptic prose in the guise of poetry.//

    Yeah -- it's a bitch getting to the age when you're not taken in by your garden variety canted detractor... but _you_ give it a try, crap-cakes. Let's see _your_ explication... but then I remember... _you_ have nothing to original to say and must wait for others to speak first. Boy... it sucks to be you.

    //And having built himself this tower, he climbs to the top like King Kong (sans Fay Ray), and there beats his breast day and night in a dominance display. "Who is like A.L.F!?" goes out his cry to the mute and deaf Void.//

    Yeah, who indeed. Anybody?

    //EXCEPT...the world isn't watching, A.L.F.//

    The world isn't, booger-lobes. Correct! But enough _individuals_ are to suit me. And you know? The trend is up, eh?

    //This voice of A.L.F out in the wilderness, prophesying a quasi-technological Rapture, this Ezekiel with foo-fighter visions, this builder of conspiracist edifices, remains, and will ever remain relegated to the fringes, to the visions that come in the night, in the dark, desert spaces of his own mind.//

    The bigger you build your fire the more darkness you _expose_, mooky-poots. I suspect you'll eventually discover that there is _always_ fringe, even as there are cowards like yourself keeping bowed back to same... and your furious activities at the fire only makes more. Sincerely, it sucks to be you.

    //A.L.F sets himself at odds with the world, not the other way around.//

    That's right, princess. And I'd strike the Sun if it offended me.

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 11:58 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This is good stuff, A.L.F.! Pure rhetoric, deeply fermented, then aged, distilled, and finally poured out by the beakerful to all who will drink of it.

    Keep it up - I can use this stuff in the lab. It's reaching reagent quality.

     
  • At 12:24 PM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    Hey... step up or stand down little buddy... anything else and you're just an inferior stand-in for Mr. Pettingill...

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 12:39 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Step up, my piles. You wouldn't last 30 minutes with me in a formal debate.

    Be that as it may, I'm not here to debate with you, or garner your respect, A.L.F. I'm here to poke you with a sharp stick and watch how you react, for fun and profit. Really and truly.

     
  • At 2:29 PM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    I wonder what motivates that poking 'implement' "died jeans"... is it _just_ amusment...? In any case? Pull back a nub.

    *Formal* debate huh? Don't you mean that kind of debate where the vagaries of of the real world are discounted because they won't hop into your _artless_ little test-tube of an overworked reductionism... discounting intuitions and levels and dimensions because _you_ can't accept the data, explain the anomaly, settle the enigma, or cherry pick your evidence.

    That's right, you'd win that one... the unbrave one, the irrelevant one, the prosaic one, the one without style. The one without imagination. The one with the ready sneer.

    More rhetoric? Maybe... but spot on rhetoric lightly dusting _your_ cookie it would seem... or was that a little 'bluster' I detected in your tepid riposte... bluster you don't pay off on, I add... Your imagined 'victory' would be phyrric at best. See... I'm not here to leap over _your_ unimaginative little hurdles... I _may_ allow you to try to jump mine. Good luck...

    Grok this... I'm not in here with you. You're in here with me. Get used to it.

    I do hope you've found this entertaining. It remains. We're talking about you, _whatever_ you call yourself, 'di-deedoo', and the only person present with his underwear up over his head _is_ you. Giggle at that. I am.

    Formal? Oooooo... formal! Take a number, nym-poots.

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 3:26 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hi, Mr. Lehmberg. Uh, I was wondering, what do you mean by "nub", as in the above, "Pull back a nub." I noticed you have periodically used the term several times on this blog here, and the only thing I can think of, based on a reference in Wikipedia, is some variant on "newbie" or "noob"; is that what you mean? Or something else? Just curious...

     
  • At 4:02 PM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    ...Say you might have had a beer too many (or just be lead-paint-eating stupid) and you poked your dismissive finger into a Tasmanian Devil's enclosure. You likely pull back a nub. The principle applies.

    It remains what *di-stuffy-knees* is poking me with, he's going to pull back a nub, literary or otherwise. He should be careful with his 'poker'.

    ...And hey! Call me Alfred! LOL!

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     
  • At 1:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    * anonymichael said...
    Hi, Mr. Lehmberg. Uh, I was wondering, what do you mean by "nub", as in the above, "Pull back a nub." I noticed you have periodically used the term several times on this blog here, and the only thing I can think of, based on a reference in Wikipedia, is some variant on "newbie" or "noob"; is that what you mean? Or something else? Just curious...
    *

    nub: slang African-American word for a very small penis.

    As in - Damn! You gots ah nub!.... Oh Hell to da NO!... I ain't goin down on that nub!....
    Yo nub dont even show! Where da hell is it? You defective!..... It aint right!

     
  • At 2:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Ah! As in "stick that finger into the lion's cage, and you'll end up pulling back a nub," or nubbin of a finger. Yow! Sounds painful. Well, strip the flesh from my boney metacarpals! ...sheesh... I should have known that one. Thanks, Alfred!

     
  • At 2:49 AM, Blogger Alfred Lehmberg said…

    As in: *Di-onni-creams* nub is so small it's used in the calibration of electron microscopes?

    Pity too, when he probably thought his nub was at _least_ a protuberance... Tsk!

    Diogenes has callused knees? I suspect so. But inject a little "formality"? ...When he can believe he's standing on default shoulders of irrelevant giants braced by his pompous reductionism? Whoa! Eh?

    ...Better back off _then_, bet your ass skippy!

    Hey, "Di-calloused-knees" -- an 'alien' , came to Descartes, a privileged wastrel on 'Grand Tour'in a dream... and in that drunken slumber told him *nature* could be *conquered* by number and measurement of same. An overburdened scientific reductionism was born.

    Bigger fire? Hah...! You would ignore the exponential increase of the shadows you'd reveal! LOL!

    alienview@roadrunner.com
    > www.AlienView.net
    >> AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
    >>> U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com

     

Post a Comment

<< Home